Queen Elizabeth II 4th Portrait Sovereigns 2000-2015 Complete date series (16 Sovereigns)
SKU: 8778136888

Queen Elizabeth II 4th Portrait Sovereigns 2000-2015 Complete date series (16 Sovereigns)

Sale price$6034.50 Regular price$6705.00
Save 10%

Shipping Estimate
USA
  • USA
  • CAN

Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 7 - Jul 12

Promo Codes Available:

For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15

Description

Queen Elizabeth II 4th Portrait Sovereigns 2000-2015 Complete date series (16 Sovereigns)Queen Elizabeth II 4th Portrait Sovereigns 2000 2015 Complete date series (16 Sovereigns) One full sovereign from each year of striking. Sovereigns were struck for years and includes 3 unique reverses for years 2002 2005 2012. Queen Elizabeth II Sovereigns (4th Portrait) 2000 2015 Obverse: Queen facing right wearing a tiara, initials IRB. denoting designer Ian Rank Broadley raised below truncation. Reverse: St. George mounted with sword attacking the

Queen Elizabeth II 4th Portrait Sovereigns 2000-2015 Complete date series (16 Sovereigns)

One full sovereign from each year of striking. Sovereigns were struck for years and includes 3 unique reverses for years 2002 / 2005 / 2012.

Queen Elizabeth II Sovereigns (4th Portrait) 2000-2015

Obverse: Queen facing right wearing a tiara, initials IRB. denoting designer Ian Rank-Broadley raised below truncation. 

Reverse: St.George mounted with sword attacking the dragon, streamer flowing from St George's helmet. The date appears below the exergue line at the bottom with the letters B.P. to the right.

Special design Reverses : 

2002: Shield design based on the original Victorian (1838-1887) Ensigns Armorial with plain shield surrounded by laurel leaves and crown. The initials TN denoting designer Timothy Noad placed within laurel leaves to the right of the shield.

2005: Contemporary design of St George slaying the dragon with sword and carrying shield. Design by Timothy Noad although his initials do not appear on the coin. The date below wing of the dragon slightly to the left of center.

2012: The design by Sculptor 'Paul Day' was the winning entry in the Royal Mints competition. The depiction of George& Dragon shows the Dragon in a fiercer light.

Individual Sovereign Specifications 

Struck in 22ct gold
Weight: 7.98g / Diameter: 22.05mm
Obverse by Ian Rank-Broadley
Featuring Reverse design of St George & the dragon by Benedetto Pistrucci
Except 2002 Timothy Noad Shield Reverse  / 2005 Contemporary Reverse /
2012 Paul Day Romanticised St George Dragon design.
Die Axis: ↑ / ↑

Set Specification

Number of Full Sovereigns: 16
Struck in 22ct gold 
Fineness: .916
Total Coin Weight: 127.68g (sovereign weighs can vary 7.96g-8.00g)
Total Gold Content: 0.234 x 16 = 3.744 Troy ounces

All Queen Elizabeth II 4th Portrait sovereigns were struck at the Liantrisant mint in Wales, none were struck at overseas mints. The photos shown are examples only, the grade you will receive will be uncirculated.

Shipping Notes
  • Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
  • Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
  • Delivery to the USA:
  1. Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
  • If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
  • We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
  • Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
  • To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
  • Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
SKU: 8778136888

Discover Niche Categories That Outsell

Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order

4.3 ★★★★★
Based on 1064 reviews
Sort
Highest Rating
Newest First
Oldest First
Product Reviews
M
Verified Purchase
Mike
Fort Morgan, US
★★★★★ 5
Runs small
Size: 36, Color: Khaki
The jeans are a nice color, and length… they run SMALL… I wear a 33-34 and bought a 36. They were skin tight but breathable material… I sent them back to order a 38
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 5, 2026
T
Verified Purchase
Tenacious
Houston, US
★★★★★ 5
I’m happy with the jeans
Size: 40, Color: Pink
I am very satisfied with this purchase. A lot of compliments too. They fit well, stretch to the material but the skinny fit look. The quality so far is great.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on March 26, 2026
E
Verified Purchase
eddie r.
Louisville, US
★★★★★ 5
Comfortable Jeans
Size: 38, Color: Khaki
Excellent pair of jeans. Super comfortable
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on April 17, 2026
D
Verified Purchase
Denise
Fort Morgan, US
★★★★★ 4
MOM-1, PANTS-1...well, I guess we both win
Size: 32, Color: Black
Purchased for my 17 yr old son, about 6'2, 180, medium built. PROS -Black pair is a nice happy medium between faded black and pitch dark. -Roomy around the waist, but not enough for children to sag (no, no, no,) -excellent price for quality of product CONS -might be too comfortable for wearer, resulting in an request for an abnormal amount of additional pairs -consistent compliments for wearer could cause inflated ego or confidence OVERALL I didn't hear any complaints from my son or "can you return this" which is a WIN for me, bc he's usually very picky. it's a whole thing with the length and the thickness, color, all of it. I thought these pants looked really nice, the color was casual enough for friends, and dressy enough for church. I was pleasantly surprised. Not a big fan of belts, but he is not comfortable with sagging (thank goodness), and the fit around the waist provided enough support to stay where they needed to. Pants also did not scrunch up at the bottom, and did not fit like capris. Product title described product to a T (or pants): slim fit stretch comfort casual classic solid- it was all of those in one!
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 2, 2025
T
Verified Purchase
Timothy Ivery
Grantham, US
★★★★★ 5
Fits great
Size: 36, Color: Brown
Fit great 👍
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 24, 2026

recommand products